Criminal liability of technology companies for crimes committed by users is one of the complex and emerging issues in criminal law that has gained increasing importance with the expansion of the digital space and the increase in the use of online platforms. These companies, as service providers, can play an effective role in facilitating or preventing the commission of crimes. The main question of the research is under what conditions and to what extent can technology companies be held criminally liable. This research was conducted with a descriptive-analytical approach and based on the study of scientific and library resources, and by examining existing legal theories and legal frameworks, an attempt has been made to extract the criteria for realizing the criminal liability of technology companies. The findings show that the realization of the criminal liability of technology companies depends on the existence of a causal relationship between the company's performance and the crime, the company's awareness or fault, and the possibility of preventing or controlling the crime by it. Also, the role of companies in committing user crimes can range from indirect cooperation to direct participation. The results of the study indicate that in order to ensure criminal justice and effectively prevent cybercrime, it is essential to update and clarify legal frameworks and judicial procedures so that the criminal liability of technology companies can be determined more accurately, fairly, and efficiently.