نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
1 دکتری حقوق بین الملل محیط زیست و مدرس دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران (نویسنده مسئول)
2 کارشناس ارشد حقوق بین الملل دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی دماوند
3 کارشناسی ارشد حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات تهران
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Responsibility of States for internationally is the result of an infringing act and a breach of international obligations. In this regard, Investigate the 2001 Act Approach It is important and has a high international status from the point of view of rules, non-compliance with treaties, international laws and norms. Scrutiny in Responsibility of States for internationally, In fact, it is because of the international system's framework for violating legal norms and treaties that do not follow governments and there is also an emphasis on the effectiveness of citations to the Responsibility of States for internationally arising from the breach of obligations Erga Omnes. Including points of reliance on Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts (2001), Exemption of liability from any comment and exception and Absolute enumeration of responsibility according to Due Diligences. This structural order of the international system originated from the supremacy of Erga Omnes and jus cogens over convergent performance in the global arena. This is the result of the convergence of international rules in the path of development and conflict of international law and the highway of international responsibility of states. Therefore, this research is based on the development of scientific past research. There is another version of the transformational approach to the regulation of international responsibility and to answer the question, how is it possible for governments to act and respond to the international responsibility for violating legal norms and treaties resulting from non-compliance? This study assumes that Responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts, without any restrictions, has a legal framework for violating the obligations of the response and that there is no compromise between them. In order to prove its hypothesis, this study deals with the evolution of Responsibility of States for internationally and the regime of responsibility and its legal and normative effects.