1
Assistant professor of criminal law and criminology department of Islamic Azad University of Shiraz(Corresponding Author)
2
PhD student of criminal law and criminology and university instructor
Abstract
Restorative justice is a process that thereunder parties regard to exam the certain criminal outcomes make some decisions. Restorative justice by various aspects differs from current criminal justice. First, it has most universal sight to criminal actions, rather than considering the crime as a mere offensive action, it believes that criminal persons offend not only her or his but offend society and victim. Second, it involves more people in counterview process against crime, in addition to criminal persons and government, victim and other people were involved in this process. Finally, this system assesses the success other gates. It rather than considers the level of imposed punishment, it assesses the restored or predicted damages. The challenge of this research is how position and approaches of restorative justice in Islamic Republic of Iran Regulation, especially, criminal proceeding regulations approved in 1392 and criminal international tribunal? This research is useful purposely and its matters has been codified by using of translated and compiled books and articles by library method.
Rezaei,G. H. and SHakeri,Y. (2019). Restorative justice in legal system in Iran and international criminal tribunal. Fares Law Research, 1(1), 39-65.
MLA
Rezaei,G. H. , and SHakeri,Y. . "Restorative justice in legal system in Iran and international criminal tribunal", Fares Law Research, 1, 1, 2019, 39-65.
HARVARD
Rezaei G. H., SHakeri Y. (2019). 'Restorative justice in legal system in Iran and international criminal tribunal', Fares Law Research, 1(1), pp. 39-65.
CHICAGO
G. H. Rezaei and Y. SHakeri, "Restorative justice in legal system in Iran and international criminal tribunal," Fares Law Research, 1 1 (2019): 39-65,
VANCOUVER
Rezaei G. H., SHakeri Y. Restorative justice in legal system in Iran and international criminal tribunal. Fares Law Research, 2019; 1(1): 39-65.