Explain the Difference of Opinion Regarding the Crime of Intentional Assault with a Cold Weapon in the Light of Criticism

Today, considering the type of cases filed in criminal courts, especially in the field of prosecution; what can be seen most often among the criminal titles of the cases are crimes such as intentional assault, intentional assault with a cold weapon, threat and coercion with a cold weapon, and so on. Undoubtedly, the judicial disagreement in the direction of each of the crimes is a natural thing and indicates the different interpretations of the judges from the texts of the legal materials. what we are trying to say here, and what is tangible in the field of prosecution in order to deal with criminal cases related to the conflict with cold steel, is the disagreement over two major and recurring issues. First, is the use of glass by individuals to harm another a crime of intentional assault with a cold weapon? And secondly, if the perpetrator confesses to intentionally injuring himself with a cold weapon and the plaintiff refuses to provide his forensic medical certificate, the judicial authority can make an effective confession in terms of considering the general aspect of the case. Should be summoned to court and eventually sent to court by indictment, or he should close the case by issuing a restraining order for not providing a forensic certificate. what it looks like; firstly, intentionally injuring people with a glass device is a crime of intentionally injuring with a cold weapon, and secondly, if a forensic medical certificate is not provided and the accused confesses effectively, the case can be referred to the public aspect of the crime. sent two to the criminal court.